# Best AI model for chart analysis — November 2026

> Best AI model for chart analysis (November 2026): on AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis, Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra are within 1.5 points of each other. Evidence, constraints, and caveats included.

## Constraints on this page

A builder choosing by accuracy, hosted processing allowed, any price, ordinary input size. Every refine link below changes one answer.

## The shortlist for chart analysis

| # | Model | Creator | AA-MMMU-Pro | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Claude Opus 5.5](/models/claude-opus-5-5) | Anthropic | 87.7% | Highest AA-MMMU-Pro result, with 1 other model within 1.5 points; $8.00 for the stated workload; 1M context |
| 2 | [GPT-6 Astra](/models/gpt-6-astra) | OpenAI | 86.9% | 86.9% on AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis; $20.00 for the stated workload; 1.05M context |
| 3 | [GPT-6.1 Sol](/models/gpt-6-1-sol) | OpenAI | 86.0% | 86.0% on AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis; $4.00 for the stated workload; 1.05M context |
| 4 | [GPT-6.1 Terra](/models/gpt-6-1-terra) | OpenAI | 84.7% | 84.7% on AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis; $2.00 for the stated workload; 1.05M context |
| 5 | [Kimi K3.1 Pro](/models/kimi-3-1-pro) | Moonshot AI | 83.9% | 83.9% on AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis; $4.00 for the stated workload; 1.05M context; Open weights; check hardware before treating local use as feasible |

Ordered by AA-MMMU-Pro result under the stated constraints.

## The top ten for chart analysis, with API prices

The first ten models on the same evidence and constraints as the shortlist, with each provider's API price in US dollars per million tokens. GPT-6 Luna costs the least of the ten for a workload of 1M input and 200k output tokens: $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens. Three of the ten have no API price on file.

| # | Model | Creator | AA-MMMU-Pro | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Claude Opus 5.5](/models/claude-opus-5-5) | Anthropic | 87.7% | $4.00 | $20.00 |
| 2 | [GPT-6 Astra](/models/gpt-6-astra) | OpenAI | 86.9% | $10.00 | $50.00 |
| 3 | [GPT-6.1 Sol](/models/gpt-6-1-sol) | OpenAI | 86.0% | $2.00 | $10.00 |
| 4 | [GPT-6.1 Terra](/models/gpt-6-1-terra) | OpenAI | 84.7% | $1.00 | $5.00 |
| 5 | [Kimi K3.1 Pro](/models/kimi-3-1-pro) | Moonshot AI | 83.9% | $2.00 | $10.00 |
| 6 | [Inkling 2 Small](/models/inkling-2-small) | Thinking Machines Lab | 81.6% | $0.30 | $1.00 |
| 7 | [Muse Spark Open](/models/muse-spark-open) | Meta | 80.9% | No API price on file |  |
| 8 | [Qwen3.7 Plus](/models/qwen3-7-plus) | Alibaba | 80.5% | No API price on file |  |
| 9 | [GPT-6 Luna](/models/gpt-6-luna) | OpenAI | 79.7% | $0.10 | $0.50 |
| 10 | [Apodex 1.1](/models/apodex-1-1) | Apodex | 79.2% | No API price on file |  |

Prices are list API rates before caching, batch discounts and special tiers. See [API pricing for every model](/llm-pricing).

## ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Copilot?

No app is clearly ahead here. On AA-MMMU-Pro, ChatGPT’s GPT-6 Astra (86.9%) and Claude Opus 5.5 (87.7%) are within 1.5 points of each other.

- ChatGPT: [GPT-6 Astra](/models/gpt-6-astra), 86.9% (highest of the three). Plan nearest $20: Plus, $20 a month, which lists: GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6.1 Terra, GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna in Codex; GPT-6.1 Sol is available in Work and Codex, not Chat.
- Claude: [Claude Opus 5.5](/models/claude-opus-5-5), 87.7% (highest of the three). Plan nearest $20: Pro, $20 a month, which lists: Opus, Sonnet and Haiku; Fable is listed under usage credits rather than the included allowance.
- Gemini: [Gemini 3.8 Flash](/models/gemini-3-8-flash), 85.6%. Plan nearest $20: Google AI Pro, $19.99 a month, which lists: Gemini 4 Argon, the Pro model and the Flash model.
- Microsoft Copilot: not scored. Microsoft doesn’t name the model Copilot runs, so no benchmark result can be attached to it. Plan nearest $20: Microsoft 365 Premium, $19.99 a month. [How it compares on plans and data terms](/compare/chatgpt-vs-copilot)

Each entry is the highest-scoring model that company sells, not the model your plan opens by default, so check what the plan lists before you pay. The plan shown is each app’s plan nearest $20, read October 16, 2026 for ChatGPT, November 10, 2026 for Copilot, and November 11, 2026 for Claude and Gemini.

Compare the apps: [ChatGPT vs Claude](/compare/chatgpt-vs-claude), [ChatGPT vs Gemini](/compare/chatgpt-vs-gemini), [Claude vs Gemini](/compare/claude-vs-gemini), [ChatGPT vs Copilot](/compare/chatgpt-vs-copilot).

## What this shortlist rests on

One benchmark: AA-MMMU-Pro. College-level questions across about thirty subjects that need the image to answer: diagrams, charts, tables, maps and photographs. The Pro version drops questions a model could answer from the text alone. A result a model's own provider ran is left out, and a model nobody has run there is not listed.

- [AA-MMMU-Pro](/benchmarks/mmmu-pro) · sets the order · run by Artificial Analysis · 114 models have a published result
- [CharXiv](/benchmarks/charxiv) · related evidence, not used for the order. Reasoning about charts from scientific papers. Each lab reports its own run, with or without tools.
- [Chartography (no tools)](/benchmarks/chartography) · related evidence, not used for the order. A hundred specialised chart types with expert answer ranges, reported by a few labs.

## What to verify before choosing

- The test covers charts among other images and is not a chart-only score. Check a model on your own figures, and read the chart benchmarks below for the labs’ own results.
- Ranked on one benchmark: AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis. 114 models have a published result; a model without one is not listed.

## Refine

- [Change any answer in the selector](/tools/llm-selector?audience=builders&family=documents&useCase=charts&priority=accuracy&privacy=hosted&budget=any&context=normal)
- [Must run on my own hardware](/tools/llm-selector?audience=builders&family=documents&useCase=charts&priority=accuracy&privacy=local&context=normal)
- [Cost matters most](/tools/llm-selector?audience=builders&family=documents&useCase=charts&priority=cost&privacy=hosted&budget=any&context=normal)
- [Speed matters most](/tools/llm-selector?audience=builders&family=documents&useCase=charts&priority=speed&privacy=hosted&budget=any&context=normal)
- [Long documents or a large codebase](/tools/llm-selector?audience=builders&family=documents&useCase=charts&priority=accuracy&privacy=hosted&budget=any&context=large)
- [Choosing an everyday assistant, not an API](/tools/llm-selector?audience=everyday&family=documents&useCase=charts&priority=accuracy&privacy=hosted&budget=any&context=normal)
- [Describe your own job instead](/tools/llm-selector)

## Questions

**Which AI model is best for chart analysis?**

No single model is clearly best for chart analysis on BenchLM's evidence. On AA-MMMU-Pro, run by Artificial Analysis, Claude Opus 5.5 (87.7%) and GPT-6 Astra (86.9%) are within 1.5 points of each other. The test covers charts among other images and is not a chart-only score. Check a model on your own figures, and read the chart benchmarks below for the labs’ own results.

**Which models come next for chart analysis?**

GPT-6.1 Sol (86.0%), GPT-6.1 Terra (84.7%), Kimi K3.1 Pro (83.9%) follow on the same benchmark. Compare the leaders on three representative examples of your own work.

**How does BenchLM pick the best ai model for chart analysis?**

The page runs the LLM Selector with fixed answers: a builder choosing by accuracy, hosted processing allowed, any price, ordinary input size. The selector uses AA-MMMU-Pro, one benchmark run by Artificial Analysis on every listed model, filters by the stated constraints, and orders by that evidence. It never adds a hidden fit score or a bonus for open weights or reasoning style.

**Why does this page use AA-MMMU-Pro and not a general score?**

A general score answers several jobs at once. AA-MMMU-Pro is closer to this job. College-level questions across about thirty subjects that need the image to answer: diagrams, charts, tables, maps and photographs. The Pro version drops questions a model could answer from the text alone. Only results Artificial Analysis published itself are used, so a model nobody has run there is not listed. 114 models have a result.

**What do the top models for chart analysis cost?**

Among the ten highest-ranked models on this page, GPT-6 Luna costs the least for a workload of 1M input and 200k output tokens: $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens. GPT-6 Astra costs the most, at $10.00 and $50.00. These are API rates in the November 13, 2026 data. Assistant subscriptions are priced separately.

**Can I change the constraints?**

Yes. Every link under "Refine" opens the selector with one answer changed, and the address carries the answers so a result can be shared or reopened against the current dataset.

Data updated 2026-11-13. Method: bench-align-v5.8-2026-09-30.

Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/best/for/charts