# Agents-A1-4B vs Claude Opus 4.8

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Agents-A1-4B and Claude Opus 4.8 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-claude-opus-4-8
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Agents-A1-4B and Claude Opus 4.8 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Agents-A1-4B has the lower published output-token price.
- Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InternScience | Anthropic |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 72.22 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 11 | 38 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $5.00 / $25.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 62.5 (Supported · #14/152)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 66.8% | 84.3% | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| GAIA | 95.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MLE-Bench Lite | 22.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 78.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 40.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | Coming soon | 21.1% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 93.1% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 83.4% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 53.9% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 59.9% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 72.97% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 21.1% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 20.6% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 71.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 66.4 (Supported · #12/151)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 29.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 59.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 88.6% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 69.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 84.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multimodal | Coming soon | 38.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| cursorBench31 | Coming soon | 58.4% | Coming soon |
| cursorBench32 | Coming soon | 62.3% | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | Coming soon | 46.5% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 87.8% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 88.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 87.8 (#3/48)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | Coming soon | 66.2% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 89.9% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 80.5% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 55.5 (#18/20)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 52.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 72.1% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | Coming soon | 1.5% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 71.4 (Supported · #9/183)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierScience Research | 33.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 93.6% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 93.6% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 49.8% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 89.6% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 75.4 (#61/123)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 69.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFEval | 94.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| INCLUDE | Coming soon | 87.6% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 65.4 (#2/7)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| USAMO 2026 | Coming soon | 96.7% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 47.241% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 31.250% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Agents-A1-4B and Claude Opus 4.8?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Agents-A1-4B vs Agents-A1](/compare/agents-a1-vs-agents-a1-4b)
- [Claude Opus 4.8 vs Agents-A1](/compare/agents-a1-vs-claude-opus-4-8)
- [Agents-A1-4B vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-agents-a1-f16-gguf)
- [Claude Opus 4.8 vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-f16-gguf-vs-claude-opus-4-8)

## Explore More

- [Agents-A1-4B profile](/models/agents-a1-4b)
- [Claude Opus 4.8 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-8)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)