# Agents-A1-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Agents-A1-4B and Step 3.7 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Agents-A1-4B and Step 3.7 Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Agents-A1-4B has the lower published output-token price.
- Agents-A1-4B has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InternScience | StepFun |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 256K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 49.95 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 11 | 11 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.20 / $1.15 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 48.6 (Estimated · #64/152)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 66.8% | 75.8% | Step 3.7 Flash |
| GAIA | 95.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MLE-Bench Lite | 22.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 78.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 40.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 59.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 92.8% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 49.5% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 67.1% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 47.2% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 51.57% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 47.1 (Estimated · #75/151)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 29.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 59.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 56.3% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 59.5% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 70.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 79.2% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 95.3% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 71.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 52.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 48.4 (Estimated · #92/183)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierScience Research | 33.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1-4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 82.1 (#52/123)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 69.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFEval | 94.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Agents-A1-4B and Step 3.7 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Agents-A1-4B vs Agents-A1](/compare/agents-a1-vs-agents-a1-4b)
- [Step 3.7 Flash vs Agents-A1](/compare/agents-a1-vs-step-3-7-flash)
- [Agents-A1-4B vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-agents-a1-f16-gguf)
- [Step 3.7 Flash vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-f16-gguf-vs-step-3-7-flash)

## Explore More

- [Agents-A1-4B profile](/models/agents-a1-4b)
- [Step 3.7 Flash profile](/models/step-3-7-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)