# Agents-A1 vs Apodex 1.1

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Agents-A1 and Apodex 1.1 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/agents-a1-vs-apodex-1-1
- Last updated: October 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Agents-A1 and Apodex 1.1 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Agents-A1 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InternScience | Apodex |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | N/A |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 53.4 | 50.64 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 10 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: 45.6 (Estimated · #47/122)
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 45.4 (Estimated · #52/122)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 75.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 47.6% | 56.1% | Apodex 1.1 |
| VITA-Bench | 38.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 70.8% | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | Coming soon | 38.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 42.7 (Estimated · #59/146)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 70.8% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 77.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: 35.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 76.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 60.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 77.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53.5 (Supported · #59/174)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 47.6% | 56.1% | Apodex 1.1 |
| FrontierScience Research | Coming soon | 63.3% | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | Coming soon | 35.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 94.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Apodex 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | Coming soon | 31/42 | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Agents-A1 and Apodex 1.1?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Agents-A1 vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-vs-agents-a1-f16-gguf)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-f16-gguf-vs-apodex-1-1)
- [Agents-A1 vs Agents-A1-FP8](/compare/agents-a1-vs-agents-a1-fp8)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Agents-A1-FP8](/compare/agents-a1-fp8-vs-apodex-1-1)

## Explore More

- [Agents-A1 profile](/models/agents-a1)
- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)