# Agents-A1 vs GPT-5.2

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Agents-A1 and GPT-5.2 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/agents-a1-vs-gpt-5-2
- Last updated: October 5, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Agents-A1 and GPT-5.2 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GPT-5.2 has the larger published context window at 400K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InternScience | OpenAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 400K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 53.24 | 60.3 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 16 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | $1.75 / $14.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: 44.9 (Estimated · #46/119)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 42.8 (Supported · #55/119)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 75.5% | 65.8% | Agents-A1 |
| HLE w/ tools | 47.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 38.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 47.3% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 46.54% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 34.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 38.2 (Supported · #66/144)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 80% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 55.6% | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 53.50% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: 35.2 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 60.7 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 60.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 52.9% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-1 | Coming soon | 86.17% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 67.3 (#22/49)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 79.5% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 83.0% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 82.1% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 75.9% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 57.7 (Supported · #47/171)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 47.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 91.2 (#15/125)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 94.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Agents-A1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 57.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 40.700% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 18.800% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Agents-A1 and GPT-5.2?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Agents-A1 vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-vs-agents-a1-f16-gguf)
- [GPT-5.2 vs Agents-A1-F16-GGUF](/compare/agents-a1-f16-gguf-vs-gpt-5-2)
- [Agents-A1 vs Agents-A1-FP8](/compare/agents-a1-vs-agents-a1-fp8)
- [GPT-5.2 vs Agents-A1-FP8](/compare/agents-a1-fp8-vs-gpt-5-2)

## Explore More

- [Agents-A1 profile](/models/agents-a1)
- [GPT-5.2 profile](/models/gpt-5-2)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)