# Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Apodex 1.1 and Claude Opus 4.8 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-claude-opus-4-8
- Last updated: October 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 5
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.8 has the higher overall point estimate 69.04 to 50.64. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in coding, where the averages are 42.7 for Apodex 1.1 and 61.1 for Claude Opus 4.8.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified in Coding, with scores of 77.7% and 88.6%.
- Apodex 1.1 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Claude Opus 4.8 also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Apodex | Anthropic |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | N/A | 1M |
| Overall Score | 50.64 | 69.04 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 40 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $5.00 / $25.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 45.4 (Estimated · #52/122)
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 61.8 (Supported · #20/122)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | 74.6% | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| HLE w/ tools | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 92.4% | 93.1% | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | Coming soon | 21.1% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 83.4% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 53.9% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 59.9% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 72.97% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 21.1% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 20.6% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 71.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Directional only
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 42.7 (Estimated · #59/146)
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 61.1 (Supported · #18/146)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | 74.6% | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.7% | 88.6% | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 69.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 84.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multimodal | Coming soon | 38.4% | Coming soon |
| cursorBench31 | Coming soon | 58.4% | Coming soon |
| CursorBench 3.2 | Coming soon | 62.3% | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | Coming soon | 46.5% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 87.8% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 88.6% | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | Coming soon | 32.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 76.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 59.1 (#23/28)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 72.1% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | Coming soon | 1.5% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-1 | Coming soon | 92.50% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 77.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 87.7 (#7/49)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | Coming soon | 66.2% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 89.9% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 80.5% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Claude Opus 4.8
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53.5 (Supported · #59/174)
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 69.3 (Supported · #15/174)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 56.1% | 57.9% | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| FrontierScience Research | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 35.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 93.6% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 93.6% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 49.8% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 89.6% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Not comparable
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| INCLUDE | Coming soon | 87.6% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 74 (#60/125)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.8 public-lane score: 65.2 (#2/7)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | 31/42 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| USAMO 2026 | Coming soon | 96.7% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 47.241% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 31.250% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Apodex 1.1 or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between Apodex 1.1 and Claude Opus 4.8?

The widest category gap is in coding, where the averages are 42.7 for Apodex 1.1 and 61.1 for Claude Opus 4.8.

### How many benchmarks does Apodex 1.1 cover on BenchLM?

Apodex 1.1 currently has 10 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.8 cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.8 currently has 40 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Apodex 1.1 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-apodex-1-1-mini)
- [Claude Opus 4.8 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-claude-opus-4-8)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-claude-opus-5-5)

## Explore More

- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [Claude Opus 4.8 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-8)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)