# Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Apodex 1.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-gemini-2-5-pro
- Last updated: October 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Apodex 1.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Apodex 1.1 has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Apodex | Google |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | N/A | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 50.64 | 49.4 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 8 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $1.25 / $10.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 45.4 (Estimated · #52/122)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 24.6 (Estimated · #97/122)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 92.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 42.01% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 42.7 (Estimated · #59/146)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 23.3 (Supported · #110/146)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.7% | 63.8% | Apodex 1.1 |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 0.40% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 54.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 76.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 69.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 77.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 71.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53.5 (Supported · #59/174)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 44 (Supported · #87/174)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 56.1% | 18.8% | Apodex 1.1 |
| FrontierScience Research | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 35.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 83% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 56.4 (#76/125)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 35.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | 31/42 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 14.138% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 4.167% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Apodex 1.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Apodex 1.1 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-apodex-1-1-mini)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)

## Explore More

- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)