# Apodex 1.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Apodex 1.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Apodex 1.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Apodex 1.1 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Apodex | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | N/A | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 50.23 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 46.8 (Estimated · #57/132)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 56.1% | 57.1% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 92.4% | 90.8% | Apodex 1.1 |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 42.1 (Estimated · #63/153)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 79.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 81.1 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 55.6 (Supported · #57/187)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierScience Research | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 35.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 54.3% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 51.0% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | 31/42 | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Apodex 1.1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Apodex 1.1 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-apodex-1-1-mini)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)

## Explore More

- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)