# Apodex 1.1 vs LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Apodex 1.1 and LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-longcat-flash-lite-sparse
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Apodex 1.1 and LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the lower published output-token price.
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Apodex 1.1 | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Apodex | Meituan |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | N/A | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 51.55 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53.3 (Estimated · #38/152)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 92.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 33.7% | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | Coming soon | 21.7% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 45.6% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 48.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 52.3 (Estimated · #47/151)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.7% | 68.2% | Apodex 1.1 |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 40.6% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 59.3% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 33.7% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 76.6 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 75.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 54.6 (Supported · #55/183)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierScience Research | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 35.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU | Coming soon | 85.3% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 79.2% | Coming soon |
| CMMLU | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| C-Eval | Coming soon | 85.8% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 69.5% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | 31/42 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 95.8% | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 65.7% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 40.5% | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | Coming soon | 49.4% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Apodex 1.1 and LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Apodex 1.1 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-apodex-1-1-mini)
- [LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-longcat-flash-lite-sparse)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-claude-fable-5-1)
- [LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-longcat-flash-lite-sparse)

## Explore More

- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse profile](/models/longcat-flash-lite-sparse)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)