# Apodex 1.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Apodex 1.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: September 21, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Apodex 1.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Apodex 1.1 has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Apodex 1.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Apodex | Xiaomi |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | N/A | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 51.9 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 12 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.14 / $0.28 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53.2 (Estimated · #41/154)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | 87.6% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| HLE w/ tools | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 92.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 73.6% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 52.3% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 27.6% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 28.80% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 80.8% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 61.2% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 95.1% | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | Coming soon | 6.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53 (Estimated · #47/156)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | 87.6% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 67.9% | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 26.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 75.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 76.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 54.8 (Supported · #56/186)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierScience Research | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 35.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | 31/42 | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Apodex 1.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Apodex 1.1 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-apodex-1-1-mini)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)

## Explore More

- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile](/models/mimo-v2-6-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)