# Apodex 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Apodex 1.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Last updated: October 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Apodex 1.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the lower published output-token price.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger published context window at 131K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Apodex | Meta |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | N/A | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 50.64 | 41.7 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 14 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 45.4 (Estimated · #52/122)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 24.9 (Estimated · #96/122)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 92.4% | 74.6% | Apodex 1.1 |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.5% | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 44.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 42.7 (Estimated · #59/146)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 31.9 (Estimated · #89/146)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% | 51.7% | Apodex 1.1 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.7% | 76% | Apodex 1.1 |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 43.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 76.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 79.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 77.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 47.4 (#41/49)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: 53.5 (Supported · #59/174)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 42.8 (Supported · #94/174)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierScience Research | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 35.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 77 (#55/125)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 77% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Apodex 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 75.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IMO 2026 | 31/42 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 94.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Apodex 1.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Apodex 1.1 vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-apodex-1-1-mini)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Apodex 1.1 Mini](/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/apodex-1-1-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)

## Explore More

- [Apodex 1.1 profile](/models/apodex-1-1)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)