# BTL-3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for BTL-3 and LFM2.5-2.6B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/btl-3-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: BTL-3 and LFM2.5-2.6B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- BTL-3 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | BTL-3 | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Bad Theory Labs | LiquidAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 39.6 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 3 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- BTL-3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 36.8 (Estimated · #129/152)

| Benchmark | BTL-3 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BFCL v4 | 88.5% | 56.9% | BTL-3 |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 5.7% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 68.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- BTL-3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 38.8 (Estimated · #121/151)

| Benchmark | BTL-3 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HumanEval | 95.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 88.1% | 59.4% | BTL-3 |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- BTL-3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 24.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- BTL-3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 36.7 (Estimated · #148/183)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- BTL-3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 47.6 (#87/123)

| Benchmark | BTL-3 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 59.2% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- BTL-3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | BTL-3 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 51.9% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between BTL-3 and LFM2.5-2.6B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [BTL-3 vs BTL-4](/compare/btl-3-vs-btl-4)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs BTL-4](/compare/btl-4-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [BTL-3 vs BTL-4 Compact](/compare/btl-3-vs-btl-4-compact)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs BTL-4 Compact](/compare/btl-4-compact-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)

## Explore More

- [BTL-3 profile](/models/btl-3)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B profile](/models/lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)