# Celeris-1 vs Exaone 4.0 32B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Celeris-1 and Exaone 4.0 32B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/celeris-1-vs-exaone-4-0-32b
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Celeris-1 and Exaone 4.0 32B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Celeris-1 | Exaone 4.0 32B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Celeris | LG AI Research |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 40.53 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 4 | 2 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.20 / $0.70 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Celeris-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Exaone 4.0 32B public-lane score: 45.5 (Estimated · #106/183)

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Celeris-1 public-lane score: 47.8 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Exaone 4.0 32B public-lane score: 27.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Exaone 4.0 32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DROP | 81.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Celeris-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Exaone 4.0 32B public-lane score: 37 (Supported · #150/181)

| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Exaone 4.0 32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-Pro | 75.9% | 81.8% | Exaone 4.0 32B |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Celeris-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Exaone 4.0 32B public-lane score: 37.9 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Exaone 4.0 32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 80.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Celeris-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Exaone 4.0 32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Celeris-1 | Exaone 4.0 32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GSM8K | 93.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 85.3% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Celeris-1 and Exaone 4.0 32B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Celeris-1 vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B](/compare/celeris-1-vs-exaone-4-0-1-2b)
- [Exaone 4.0 32B vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B](/compare/exaone-4-0-1-2b-vs-exaone-4-0-32b)
- [Celeris-1 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/celeris-1-vs-claude-fable-5-1)
- [Exaone 4.0 32B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-exaone-4-0-32b)

## Explore More

- [Celeris-1 profile](/models/celeris-1)
- [Exaone 4.0 32B profile](/models/exaone-4-0-32b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)