# Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Llama 4 Scout

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Llama 4 Scout across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-4-1-opus-thinking-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: October 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 0
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

No benchmark verdict yet: there is no shared sourced benchmark row for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Llama 4 Scout.

## Summary

- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Llama 4 Scout do not currently share a sourced benchmark row. The mirror therefore compares metadata, pricing, context windows, and each model's separately reported coverage without naming a benchmark winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Llama 4 Scout |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Meta |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 10M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 39.37 | 28.2 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 6.8 (Estimated · #125/128)

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 9 (Estimated · #147/150)

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking public-lane score: 78.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 44.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking public-lane score: 64.5 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 42.5 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking public-lane score: 43.9 (Estimated · #103/184)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 26.6 (Estimated · #167/184)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking public-lane score: 66.5 (#75/148)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 45.8 (#104/148)

## FAQ

### Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but sourced benchmark coverage is still incomplete for a fair score-level comparison.

### Why does this page show "coming soon" values?

BenchLM only calls winners when public benchmark coverage is available on both sides of the comparison.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Claude 4.1 Opus](/compare/claude-4-1-opus-vs-claude-4-1-opus-thinking)
- [Llama 4 Scout vs Claude 4.1 Opus](/compare/claude-4-1-opus-vs-llama-4-scout)
- [Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-4-1-opus-thinking-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-llama-4-scout)

## Explore More

- [Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking profile](/models/claude-4-1-opus-thinking)
- [Llama 4 Scout profile](/models/llama-4-scout)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)