# Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Fable 5.2 and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Last updated: November 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Fable 5.2 and Muse Glimmer 30B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the lower published output-token price.
- Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Meta |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 91.19 | 32.41 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 30 | 14 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $8.00 / $40.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: 90.7 (Estimated · #1/132)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 19.7 (Estimated · #119/132)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 67.60% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 74.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 51.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.1 Offline | 89.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WANDR | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Remote Labor Index | 41.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| RoboDojo Sim | 64.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DRACO | 87.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 44.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: 86.9 (Estimated · #1/158)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 24.6 (Estimated · #125/158)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 93% | 51.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| SWE Multilingual | 96.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multimodal | 74.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 74.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 69.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | 85.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 49.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 76% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 51.7% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 43.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: 90.7 (Supported · #1/157)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 28.1 (Estimated · #128/157)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-3 | 65.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter | 94.90% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| STEM Professor Bench | 61.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: 89.8 (Estimated · #1/67)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 41.7 (Estimated · #62/67)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Chartography (no tools) | 73.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Chartography (tools) | 91.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OfficeQA | 83.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OfficeQA Pro | 72.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BenchCAD 2.1 | 75.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BenchCAD 2.1 (tools) | 83.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: 97.6 (Supported · #1/179)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 37.6 (Estimated · #124/179)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 74.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 73.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PhysicianBench | 64.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GMMLU | 96.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MILU | 94.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 81.1 (#61/157)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 77% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 81.1 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 94.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Fable 5.2 and Muse Glimmer 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-claude-fable-5-2)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5](/compare/claude-fable-vs-claude-fable-5-2)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5](/compare/claude-fable-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)

## Explore More

- [Claude Fable 5.2 profile](/models/claude-fable-5-2)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)