# Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-fable-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: September 21, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.7 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Grok 4.7 has the lower published output-token price.
- Claude Fable 5 has the larger published context window at 1M+.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Fable 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | xAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M+ | 500K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 81.76 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 19 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $10.00 / $50.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5 public-lane score: 75.4 (Supported · #3/154)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 34.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 85% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 80.5% | 76.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| ApprenticeBench | 34% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 38.00% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5 public-lane score: 77.8 (Supported · #2/156)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 80% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 47.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 53.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench31 | 70.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench32 | 70.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VulcanBench v3 | 89.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 89.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 95.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench40 | Coming soon | 46.3% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 71.0% | Coming soon |
| EEBench | Coming soon | 64.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5 public-lane score: 77.6 (#6/19)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: 73.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5 public-lane score: 62.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OfficeQA Pro | 57.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5 public-lane score: 83.8 (Supported · #2/186)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 93.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 91.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 56.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Fable 5 public-lane score: 77 (#57/124)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.7?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-vs-claude-fable-5-1)
- [Grok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-grok-4-7)
- [Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/claude-fable-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-grok-4-7)

## Explore More

- [Claude Fable 5 profile](/models/claude-fable)
- [Grok 4.7 profile](/models/grok-4-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)