# Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 67.22 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 17 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Haiku 5.5 public-lane score: 61.4 (Supported · #25/132)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 39.20% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 57.4% | 57.1% | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
| MazeBench | 1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Hermes Index | 37.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Hermes Bench | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 90.8% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Haiku 5.5 public-lane score: 51.9 (Supported · #42/153)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 46.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Bug Hunt Bench | 21.5 fixes | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Haiku 5.5 public-lane score: 60.1 (#23/27)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter | 2.82% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Haiku 5.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ParseBench | 57.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Chartography (no tools) | 46.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Haiku 5.5 public-lane score: 66.4 (Supported · #29/187)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE w/o tools | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 54.3% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 51.0% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Haiku 5.5 public-lane score: 79.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 75.088% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 46.341% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-ling-3-0-flash)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)

## Explore More

- [Claude Haiku 5.5 profile](/models/claude-haiku-5-5)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)