# Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Hy4

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Hy4 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-hy4
- Last updated: November 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Mythos 5.2 and Hy4 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Hy4 has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Mythos 5.2 | Hy4 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Type | Proprietary | Pending |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 14 | 15 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $8.00 / $40.00 | $0.834 / $2.501 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Mythos 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Hy4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Mythos 5.2 | Hy4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 70.50% | 44.40% | Claude Mythos 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 75.3% | 19.8% | Claude Mythos 5.2 |
| CVE Rediscovery | 89.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | 38.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Binary Exploitation Benchmark | 148 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 59.1% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 41.0% | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | Coming soon | 75.2% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 56.2% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.1 | Coming soon | 78.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Mythos 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Hy4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Mythos 5.2 | Hy4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 74.9% | Coming soon |
| sweMarathon | Coming soon | 43.8% | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 30.0% | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | Coming soon | 31.0% | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.2 | Coming soon | 35.2% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Mythos 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Hy4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Mythos 5.2 | Hy4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Biomedical image analysis | 80.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 78.6% | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench w/ Python | Coming soon | 55.4% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Mythos 5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Hy4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Mythos 5.2 | Hy4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| De novo protein-binder design | 85.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Protein Design | 64.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SingleCellBench | 65.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Protocols (troubleshooting) | 77.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Protein Domain ID | 91.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Protein Mutation Attribution | 51.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Morphology-to-molecule matching | 35.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Medicinal chemistry | 69.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 59.1% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Hy4?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Claude Mythos 5](/compare/claude-mythos-5-vs-claude-mythos-5-2)
- [Hy4 vs Claude Mythos 5](/compare/claude-mythos-5-vs-hy4)
- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Claude Mythos 5.1](/compare/claude-mythos-5-1-vs-claude-mythos-5-2)
- [Hy4 vs Claude Mythos 5.1](/compare/claude-mythos-5-1-vs-hy4)

## Explore More

- [Claude Mythos 5.2 profile](/models/claude-mythos-5-2)
- [Hy4 profile](/models/hy4)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)