# Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Claude Opus 4.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking-vs-claude-opus-4-7
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Claude Opus 4.7 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 56.09 | 70.22 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 1 | 13 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | $5.00 / $25.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 58.5 (Supported · #32/151)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | Claude Opus 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 65.59% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 20.7% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 13.9% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 68.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: 55.2 (Estimated · #41/183)
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 62.7 (Supported · #15/183)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | Claude Opus 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 20.63% | 71.00% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| React Native Evals | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | Coming soon | 38.5% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 85.1% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.0% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: 69 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: 75.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: 56.1 (Estimated · #54/181)
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 64.9 (Estimated · #26/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | Claude Opus 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 90.2% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 89.9% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: 69.7 (#63/120)
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 60.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | Claude Opus 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 43.793% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 22.917% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Claude Opus 4.7?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5](/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-claude-opus-4-5-thinking)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.5](/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-claude-opus-4-7)
- [Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking profile](/models/claude-opus-4-5-thinking)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)