# Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ling 2.6 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.6 and Ling 2.6 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-ling-2-6-flash
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 0
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

No benchmark verdict yet: there is no shared sourced benchmark row for Claude Opus 4.6 and Ling 2.6 Flash.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.6 and Ling 2.6 Flash do not currently share a sourced benchmark row. The mirror therefore compares metadata, pricing, context windows, and each model's separately reported coverage without naming a benchmark winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 69.84 | 43.68 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 33 | 0 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 54.5 (Supported · #39/151)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 39.9 (Estimated · #122/151)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 83.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 72.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 70.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 73.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 66.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 61.85% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 19.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 36.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 56.4 (Supported · #40/183)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 42.7 (Estimated · #127/183)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | 75.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench Pro | 70.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 53.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 65.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 84.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 57.57% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 26.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 58.8 (#28/48)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ERQA | 51.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 83.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | 64.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 65.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 41.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 61.7 (Estimated · #33/181)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 41.4 (Estimated · #132/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 91.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 89.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SuperGPQA | 95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 82% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | 89.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 53% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 14.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 52.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 52.3 (#76/120)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 46.6 (#86/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 58.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | 99.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 40.700% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 22.900% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Can I compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Ling 2.6 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but sourced benchmark coverage is still incomplete for a fair score-level comparison.

### Why does this page show "coming soon" values?

BenchLM only calls winners when public benchmark coverage is available on both sides of the comparison.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-claude-opus-4-6-thinking)
- [Ling 2.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-6-thinking-vs-ling-2-6-flash)
- [Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-claude-opus-4-6)
- [Ling 2.6 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-ling-2-6-flash)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.6 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-6)
- [Ling 2.6 Flash profile](/models/ling-2-6-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)