# Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.6 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 4
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.6 leads overall 69 to 40.6.
- The clearest category separation is in instruction following, where the averages are 52.6 for Claude Opus 4.6 and 75.9 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is ScreenSpot Pro in Multimodal & Grounded, with scores of 83.1% and 57.8%.
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Claude Opus 4.6 also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 256K |
| Overall Score | 69 | 40.6 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 34 | 16 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 50.1 (Supported · #56/152)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: 44.3 (Estimated · #90/152)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 83.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 72.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 70.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 73.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 66.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 61.85% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 19.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 36.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | 5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld | Coming soon | 47.4% | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | Coming soon | 45.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 56.6 (Supported · #37/151)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: 40.2 (Estimated · #116/151)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | 75.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench Pro | 70.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 53.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 65.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 84.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 57.57% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 26.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v5 | Coming soon | 63.2% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 32% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 59.5 (#28/48)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: 39.3 (#42/48)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ERQA | 51.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 83.1% | 57.8% | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | 64.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU | Coming soon | 70.8% | Coming soon |
| MMLongBench-Doc | Coming soon | 57.5% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 76.3% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle) | Coming soon | 72.2% | Coming soon |
| AI2D_TEST | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| RefCOCO (avg) | Coming soon | 90.5% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 67.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: 48.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 61 (Estimated · #34/183)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: 38.7 (Supported · #143/183)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 91.3% | 72.2% | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| GPQA-D | 89.2% | 72.2% | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| SuperGPQA | 95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 82% | 77.3% | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | 89.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 53% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 14.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 52.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 52.6 (#78/123)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: 75.9 (#59/123)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 74.2% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Coming soon
- Claude Opus 4.6 public-lane score: 58.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | 99.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 40.700% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 22.900% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 82.1% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.6 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.6 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

The widest category gap is in instruction following, where the averages are 52.6 for Claude Opus 4.6 and 75.9 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.6 cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has 34 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B cover on BenchLM?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B currently has 16 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-claude-opus-4-6-thinking)
- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-6-thinking-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b)
- [Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-claude-opus-4-6)
- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.6 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-6)
- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B profile](/models/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)