# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-deepseek-v4-pro-0813
- Last updated: September 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 11
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads overall 68.56 to 63.48.
- The clearest category separation is in coding, where the averages are 57.8 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and 50.3 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2 in Reasoning, with scores of 75.8% and 61.3%.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Overall Score | 68.56 | 63.48 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 42 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $1.32 / $3.96 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 59.1 (Supported · #19/105)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 55 (Supported · #29/105)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | 67.9% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | 83.4% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | 73.6% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | 83.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 60.0% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 51.8% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 74.1% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 25.7% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 31.8% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 54.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 57.8 (Estimated · #20/135)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 50.3 (Supported · #39/135)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | 80.6% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | 55.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | 67.9% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| LiveCodeBench Pass@1-COT | Coming soon | 93.5% | Coming soon |
| Codeforces | Coming soon | 3206.0 | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 76.2% | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 49.93% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 61.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 62.7% | Coming soon |
| DSBench-FullStack | Coming soon | 71.1% | Coming soon |
| DSBench-Hard | Coming soon | 67.2% | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | Coming soon | 59.0% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 87.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 96.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 53.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 56.9 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | 61.3% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MRCR 1M | Coming soon | 83.5% | Coming soon |
| CorpusQA 1M | Coming soon | 62.0% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-1 | Coming soon | 90.00% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 50.1 (#38/50)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 64.1 (Estimated · #27/158)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 63.4 (Estimated · #29/158)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | 90.1% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | 90.1% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| HLE | 54.7% | 42.7% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 87.5% | Coming soon |
| SimpleQA | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| Chinese-SimpleQA | Coming soon | 84.4% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 87.0% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 80.2 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 95.2% | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | Coming soon | 89.8% | Coming soon |
| Apex | Coming soon | 38.3% | Coming soon |
| Apex Shortlist | Coming soon | 90.2% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

The widest category gap is in coding, where the averages are 57.8 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and 50.3 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cover on BenchLM?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 currently has 42 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-deepseek-v4-pro-0813)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-gpt-6-astra)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 profile](/models/deepseek-v4-pro-0813)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)