# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Gemini 2.5 Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gemini-2-5-pro
- Last updated: September 29, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Gemini 2.5 Pro share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Google |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 68.46 | 50.17 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 8 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $1.25 / $10.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 59.1 (Supported · #22/117)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 25.4 (Estimated · #91/117)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 42.01% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 57.9 (Estimated · #24/143)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 24.4 (Supported · #108/143)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | 63.8% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 0.40% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 54.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 53.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 69.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 50.1 (#39/50)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 71.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 63.9 (Estimated · #29/169)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 44.1 (Supported · #80/169)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | 83% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 54.7% | 18.8% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 56.4 (#76/124)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 35.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 14.138% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 4.167% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)