# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs GLM-4.6

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.6 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 0
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

No benchmark verdict yet: there is no shared sourced benchmark row for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.6.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.6 do not currently share a sourced benchmark row. The mirror therefore compares metadata, pricing, context windows, and each model's separately reported coverage without naming a benchmark winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 69.94 | 53.94 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 3 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 61 (Supported · #21/151)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 59.6 (Estimated · #27/183)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 48.8 (Estimated · #84/183)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 3.09% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 50.3 (#36/48)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 49.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 41.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 61.9 (Estimated · #31/181)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 45.3 (Estimated · #115/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 42.1 (#98/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 27.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 3.819% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 2.128% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.6 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but sourced benchmark coverage is still incomplete for a fair score-level comparison.

### Why does this page show "coming soon" values?

BenchLM only calls winners when public benchmark coverage is available on both sides of the comparison.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-4-6)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-glm-4-6)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-4.6 profile](/models/glm-4-6)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)