# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs GPT-6 Sol

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GPT-6 Sol across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gpt-6-sol
- Last updated: September 23, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.6

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GPT-6 Sol share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GPT-6 Sol has the lower published output-token price.
- GPT-6 Sol has the larger published context window at 1.05M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1.05M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 68.83 | 82.17 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 10 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $2.00 / $10.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 58.6 (Supported · #19/105)
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 60.3 (Supported · #15/105)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | 60.5% | GPT-6 Sol |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 56.4% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 33.2% | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | Coming soon | 22.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 56.9 (Estimated · #22/135)
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 65.6 (Supported · #7/135)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 68.8% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 49.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 78.5 (#5/18)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 50.1 (#38/50)
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 82.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 62.6 (Estimated · #28/160)
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 79.6 (Supported · #7/160)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench (raw) | Coming soon | 47.1% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench (length-adjusted) | Coming soon | 53.2% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 60.8% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional (raw) | Coming soon | 59.5% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | Coming soon | 30.1% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | GPT-6 Sol | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and GPT-6 Sol?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gpt-6-sol)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-gpt-6-sol)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GPT-6 Sol profile](/models/gpt-6-sol)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)