# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and LFM2.5-24B-A2B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b
- Last updated: October 13, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 4
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the higher overall point estimate 67.96 to 37.8. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in agentic, where the averages are 59.7 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and 30.2 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is HLE in Knowledge, with scores of 54.7% and 7.4%.
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | LiquidAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Overall Score | 67.96 | 37.8 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 13 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $0.10 / $1.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 59.7 (Supported · #24/124)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #88/124)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 27.7% | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 65.0% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 8.0% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 83.2% | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | Coming soon | 26.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 55.8 (Estimated · #29/149)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #98/149)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | 51% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 32.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 57.4 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 53.7 (#46/54)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 65.6 (Estimated · #29/181)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 40.8 (Estimated · #112/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | 74.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | 74.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| HLE | 54.7% | 7.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 75.6 (#61/128)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 96.8% | Coming soon |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 74.7% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 96.0% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or LFM2.5-24B-A2B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and LFM2.5-24B-A2B?

The widest category gap is in agentic, where the averages are 59.7 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and 30.2 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does LFM2.5-24B-A2B cover on BenchLM?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B currently has 13 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B profile](/models/lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)