# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Beam

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Beam across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-reflection-beam
- Last updated: October 5, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 6
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the higher overall point estimate 67.92 to 0. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is HLE w/o tools in Knowledge, with scores of 46.9% and 36.2%.
- Beam is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Reflection AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Pending |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | null |
| Overall Score | 67.92 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 16 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 59.3 (Supported · #23/119)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | 77.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | 78.7% | Beam |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 56.4 (Estimated · #27/144)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | 80.9% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | 65.5% | Beam |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 44.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 34.6% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 78% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 49.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 53.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LongBench v2 | Coming soon | 65.5% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 50.1 (#38/49)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 64 (Estimated · #31/171)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | 90.5% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| HLE | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | 36.2% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 79.7% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 97.8% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Beam?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Beam cover on BenchLM?

Beam currently has 16 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Beam vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-reflection-beam)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [Beam vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-reflection-beam)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Beam profile](/models/reflection-beam)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)