# Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Sakana Fugu

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Sakana Fugu across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-sakana-fugu
- Last updated: September 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 5
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Sakana Fugu only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) leads overall 68.56 to 65.
- The clearest category separation is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 50.1 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and 68.6 for Sakana Fugu.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is CharXiv in Multimodal & Grounded, with scores of 91% and 85.1%.
- Sakana Fugu is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Sakana AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Overall Score | 68.56 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 11 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 59.1 (Supported · #19/105)
- Sakana Fugu public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 79.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 77.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 73.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 45.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 57.8 (Estimated · #20/135)
- Sakana Fugu public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 64.3% | 59% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 92.9% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench Pro | Coming soon | 87.8% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 60.1% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 53.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Sakana Fugu public-lane score: 70.6 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 128K-256K | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MRCRv2 | Coming soon | 86.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 50.1 (#38/50)
- Sakana Fugu public-lane score: 68.6 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 91% | 85.1% | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: 64.1 (Estimated · #27/158)
- Sakana Fugu public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | 95.5% | Sakana Fugu |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | 95.5% | Sakana Fugu |
| HLE | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 46.9% | 47.2% | Sakana Fugu |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sakana Fugu public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) | Sakana Fugu | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath (legacy) | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Sakana Fugu?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and Sakana Fugu?

The widest category gap is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 50.1 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) and 68.6 for Sakana Fugu.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Sakana Fugu cover on BenchLM?

Sakana Fugu currently has 11 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Sakana Fugu vs Claude Opus 4.7](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-sakana-fugu)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-sakana-fugu-ultra)
- [Sakana Fugu vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra](/compare/sakana-fugu-vs-sakana-fugu-ultra)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [Sakana Fugu profile](/models/sakana-fugu)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)