# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-4.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-4.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 5
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher overall point estimate 65.18 to 48.42. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in agentic, where the averages are 54 for Claude Opus 4.7 and 31.8 for GLM-4.7.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Gert Labs in Agentic, with scores of 65.59% and 39.95%.
- GLM-4.7 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Claude Opus 4.7 also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 200K |
| Overall Score | 65.18 | 48.42 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 54 (Supported · #40/124)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 31.8 (Estimated · #84/124)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 65.59% | 39.95% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | 7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 41% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 52% | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | Coming soon | 15.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Claude Opus 4.7
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 55.6 (Supported · #30/149)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 37.7 (Supported · #70/149)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 71.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.1% | 82.2% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | 69.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 28.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 73.8% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 84.9% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | Coming soon | 58.7% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 41.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 74.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 65.3 (Estimated · #30/181)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 44.5 (Supported · #98/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | 80.1% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.9% | 82.7% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 85.7% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 24.8% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#51/128)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 72.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 70.175% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 31.707% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 95.7% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 97.1% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-4.7?

The widest category gap is in agentic, where the averages are 54 for Claude Opus 4.7 and 31.8 for GLM-4.7.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 currently has 15 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-4.7 cover on BenchLM?

GLM-4.7 currently has 17 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-glm-4-7)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-5-5)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-glm-4-7)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)