# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5.3-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-5-3-flash
- Last updated: October 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 5
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher overall point estimate 64.23 to 57.36. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in coding, where the averages are 55.9 for Claude Opus 4.7 and 49.3 for GLM-5.3-Flash.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is SWE-bench (Vals) in Coding, with scores of 82.0% and 92.0%.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Overall Score | 64.23 | 57.36 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 21 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: GLM-5.3-Flash
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 53.8 (Supported · #40/123)
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 55.7 (Supported · #34/123)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 65.59% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | 62.9% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| ApprenticeBench | 7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 48.8% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 26.3% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 55.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Claude Opus 4.7
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 55.9 (Supported · #29/146)
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 49.3 (Supported · #42/146)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 71.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.1% | 80.5% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | 92.0% | GLM-5.3-Flash |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 28.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 63.4% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 56.3% | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | Coming soon | 57.3% | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | Coming soon | 18.1% | Coming soon |
| Bug Hunt Bench | Coming soon | 17.7 fixes | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 81.1 (#11/28)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 84 (#14/54)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | Coming soon | 62.4% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 89.4% | Coming soon |
| Chartography (tools) | Coming soon | 78.0% | Coming soon |
| BabyVision | Coming soon | 53.4% | Coming soon |
| MMVU | Coming soon | 80.5% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 65.3 (Estimated · #32/177)
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 60.5 (Supported · #43/177)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | 86.4% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.9% | 86.1% | Claude Opus 4.7 |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 61.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 43.793% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 22.917% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-5.3-Flash?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5.3-Flash?

The widest category gap is in coding, where the averages are 55.9 for Claude Opus 4.7 and 49.3 for GLM-5.3-Flash.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 currently has 15 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-5.3-Flash cover on BenchLM?

GLM-5.3-Flash currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-5.3-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-5.3-Flash vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-glm-5-3-flash)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [GLM-5.3-Flash profile](/models/glm-5-3-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)