# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-5
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-5 has the lower published output-token price.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 65.18 | 54.59 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 38 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $1.00 / $3.20 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 54 (Supported · #40/124)
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 40.9 (Estimated · #60/124)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 65.59% | 50.99% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | 7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 56.2% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 62% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 50.4% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 57.7% | Coming soon |
| QwenClawBench | Coming soon | 54.1% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 65.6% | Coming soon |
| DeepPlanning | Coming soon | 14.6% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 38% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 31.1% | Coming soon |
| MCP-Tasks | Coming soon | 60.8% | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | Coming soon | 69.8% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 43.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 55.6 (Supported · #30/149)
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 38.4 (Estimated · #68/149)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 71.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 82.8% | 74.8% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 28.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 77.8% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | Coming soon | 72.8% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 55.1% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 73.3% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 35.9% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | Coming soon | 62.8% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 56.2% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 70.9 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | Coming soon | 60.8% | Coming soon |
| AI-Needle | Coming soon | 63.3% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 65.3 (Estimated · #30/181)
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 50.5 (Estimated · #78/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 86% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 86.0% | Coming soon |
| SuperGPQA | Coming soon | 66.8% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 85.7% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | Coming soon | 85.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 30.5% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 89.5 (#6/17)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-ProX | Coming soon | 83.1% | Coming soon |
| NOVA-63 | Coming soon | 55.1% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 88.6 (#34/128)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 92.6% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 72.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 83 (Unranked · 6 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 70.175% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 31.707% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 95.8% | Coming soon |
| AIME25 (Arcee) | Coming soon | 93.3% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 97.5% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | Coming soon | 96.9% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 86.4% | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | Coming soon | 82.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-5 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-glm-5)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-5 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-vs-glm-5-3)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [GLM-5 profile](/models/glm-5)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)