# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5V-Turbo across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-5v-turbo
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5V-Turbo share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-5V-Turbo has the lower published output-token price.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 65.18 | 49.37 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 2 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $1.20 / $4.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 54 (Supported · #40/124)
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5V-Turbo | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 65.59% | 30.76% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | 7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 53.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 55.6 (Supported · #30/149)
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: 32.7 (Estimated · #84/149)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5V-Turbo | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 71.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 28.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: 74.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: 71.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 65.3 (Estimated · #30/181)
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: 45.8 (Estimated · #93/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5V-Turbo | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: 74 (#65/128)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 72.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-5V-Turbo public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-5V-Turbo | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 70.175% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 31.707% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GLM-5V-Turbo vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-glm-5v-turbo)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-5V-Turbo vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-glm-5v-turbo)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [GLM-5V-Turbo profile](/models/glm-5v-turbo)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)