# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gpt-4-1
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GPT-4.1 has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 70.22 | 43.81 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $2.00 / $8.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 58.5 (Supported · #32/151)
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 65.59% | 25.65% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 62.7 (Supported · #15/183)
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: 38.8 (Supported · #143/183)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 71.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 54.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: 50.2 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: 67.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 64.9 (Estimated · #26/181)
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: 40.7 (Supported · #135/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU | Coming soon | 90.2% | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 66.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: 50.3 (#80/120)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 87.4% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 60.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GPT-4.1 public-lane score: 28.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 43.793% | 5.517% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 22.917% | 0.000% | Claude Opus 4.7 |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GPT-4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gpt-4-1)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1 mini](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gpt-4-1-mini)
- [GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 mini](/compare/gpt-4-1-vs-gpt-4-1-mini)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [GPT-4.1 profile](/models/gpt-4-1)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)