# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 nano

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 nano across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gpt-5-4-nano
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 8
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher overall point estimate 65.18 to 47.14. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in coding, where the averages are 55.6 for Claude Opus 4.7 and 30.3 for GPT-5.4 nano.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Vibe Code Bench in Coding, with scores of 71.00% and 26.10%.
- GPT-5.4 nano is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Claude Opus 4.7 also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 400K |
| Overall Score | 65.18 | 47.14 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 21 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $5.00 / $25.00 | $0.20 / $1.25 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Claude Opus 4.7
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 54 (Supported · #40/124)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 32.2 (Supported · #82/124)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 65.59% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | 41.6% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| ApprenticeBench | 7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 46.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 39% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 56.1% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 35.5% | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | Coming soon | 92.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Claude Opus 4.7
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 55.6 (Supported · #30/149)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 30.3 (Supported · #95/149)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 71.00% | 26.10% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| React Native Evals | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.1% | 84.0% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | 69.8% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 28.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 46.3% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 40.6 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-1 | Coming soon | 51.50% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 5.7% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 52.1 (#48/54)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 66.1% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro w/ Python | Coming soon | 69.5% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Directional only
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 65.3 (Estimated · #30/181)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 40.3 (Supported · #115/181)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | 77.5% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.9% | 77.2% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 37.7% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 24.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 93.3 (#11/128)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Claude Opus 4.7 public-lane score: 72.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 52.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 70.175% | 44.912% | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 31.707% | 12.195% | Claude Opus 4.7 |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 nano?

The widest category gap is in coding, where the averages are 55.6 for Claude Opus 4.7 and 30.3 for GPT-5.4 nano.

### How many benchmarks does Claude Opus 4.7 cover on BenchLM?

Claude Opus 4.7 currently has 15 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does GPT-5.4 nano cover on BenchLM?

GPT-5.4 nano currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-4-7-adaptive)
- [GPT-5.4 nano vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-adaptive-vs-gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 Pro](/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gpt-5-4-pro)
- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4 Pro](/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-gpt-5-4-pro)

## Explore More

- [Claude Opus 4.7 profile](/models/claude-opus-4-7)
- [GPT-5.4 nano profile](/models/gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)