# Command A+ vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Command A+ and Gemini 3.1 Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gemini-3-1-pro
- Last updated: October 2, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 4
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Gemini 3.1 Pro has the higher overall point estimate 65.09 to 36.58. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 16.1 for Command A+ and 80.1 for Gemini 3.1 Pro.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) in Agentic, with scores of 17.6% and 70.8%.
- Command A+ is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Cohere | Google |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Overall Score | 36.58 | 65.09 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 29 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.50 / $10.00 | $2.00 / $12.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- Command A+ public-lane score: 15.9 (Estimated · #102/119)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 39.3 (Supported · #59/119)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| τ²-bench results | 85% | 95.6% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 17.6% | 70.8% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 57.8% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 69.7% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 56.87% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 13.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Directional only
- Command A+ public-lane score: 23.3 (Estimated · #112/144)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 42.3 (Supported · #61/144)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench Pro | Coming soon | 82.9% | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | Coming soon | 78.9% | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 32.03% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | Coming soon | 22.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Command A+ public-lane score: 58.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 54.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 77.1% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | Coming soon | 0.4% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Command A+ public-lane score: 16.1 (#48/49)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 80.1 (#13/49)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | 75.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 63% | 83.9% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| CharXiv | 52.7% | 80.2% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 69.4% | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 72.4% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 84.4% | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | Coming soon | 29.0% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | Coming soon | 81.3% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Directional only
- Command A+ public-lane score: 27.7 (Estimated · #145/171)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 66.2 (Supported · #22/171)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 94.3% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 45.4% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | Coming soon | 20.6% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 71.5% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 95.5% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 91.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Command A+ public-lane score: 89.2 (#20/125)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Command A+ public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 54.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 36.900% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 16.700% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Command A+ or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between Command A+ and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

The widest category gap is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 16.1 for Command A+ and 80.1 for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

### How many benchmarks does Command A+ cover on BenchLM?

Command A+ currently has 5 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Gemini 3.1 Pro cover on BenchLM?

Gemini 3.1 Pro currently has 29 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Command A+ vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Command A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-command-a-plus)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-3-1-pro)

## Explore More

- [Command A+ profile](/models/command-a-plus)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro profile](/models/gemini-3-1-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)