# Command A+ vs Gemma 4 E4B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Command A+ and Gemma 4 E4B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gemma-4-e4b
- Last updated: October 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Command A+ and Gemma 4 E4B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Gemma 4 E4B has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Command A+ | Gemma 4 E4B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Cohere | Google |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 36.4 | 31.33 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 5 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.50 / $10.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 16 (Estimated · #107/123)
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemma 4 E4B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| τ²-bench results | 85% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 17.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 21.5 (Estimated · #115/146)
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 13.1 (Estimated · #134/146)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemma 4 E4B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 52.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 62.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 32.4 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemma 4 E4B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCRv2 | Coming soon | 25.4% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 34.6 (#51/54)
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 22.2 (#52/54)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemma 4 E4B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | 75.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 63% | 52.6% | Command A+ |
| CharXiv | 52.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 30.9 (Estimated · #144/177)
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 26 (Estimated · #163/177)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | Gemma 4 E4B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | Coming soon | 58.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 69.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 90.7 (#24/127)
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 51.9 (#80/127)

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Command A+ and Gemma 4 E4B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Command A+ vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b)
- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [Command A+ vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gemma-4-31b)
- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)

## Explore More

- [Command A+ profile](/models/command-a-plus)
- [Gemma 4 E4B profile](/models/gemma-4-e4b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)