# Command A+ vs GPT-5.2-Codex

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Command A+ and GPT-5.2-Codex across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gpt-5-2-codex
- Last updated: October 2, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 0
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

No benchmark verdict yet: there is no shared sourced benchmark row for Command A+ and GPT-5.2-Codex.

## Summary

- Command A+ and GPT-5.2-Codex do not currently share a sourced benchmark row. The mirror therefore compares metadata, pricing, context windows, and each model's separately reported coverage without naming a benchmark winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Command A+ | GPT-5.2-Codex |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 400K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 36.58 | 56.76 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 5 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.50 / $10.00 | $1.75 / $14.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 15.9 (Estimated · #102/119)
- GPT-5.2-Codex public-lane score: 40.3 (Estimated · #57/119)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| τ²-bench results | 85% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 17.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 51.79% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 26.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 23.3 (Estimated · #112/144)
- GPT-5.2-Codex public-lane score: 46.5 (Supported · #49/144)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 37.91% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 88.0% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 72.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 58.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GPT-5.2-Codex public-lane score: 78.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 16.1 (#48/49)
- GPT-5.2-Codex public-lane score: 73.5 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | 75.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 63% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 52.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 27.7 (Estimated · #145/171)
- GPT-5.2-Codex public-lane score: 55.5 (Estimated · #49/171)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Command A+ public-lane score: 89.2 (#20/125)
- GPT-5.2-Codex public-lane score: 92.4 (#3/125)

## FAQ

### Can I compare Command A+ and GPT-5.2-Codex on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but sourced benchmark coverage is still incomplete for a fair score-level comparison.

### Why does this page show "coming soon" values?

BenchLM only calls winners when public benchmark coverage is available on both sides of the comparison.

## Related Comparisons

- [Command A+ vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/command-a-plus-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-5-2-codex-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Command A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-command-a-plus)
- [GPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gpt-5-2-codex)

## Explore More

- [Command A+ profile](/models/command-a-plus)
- [GPT-5.2-Codex profile](/models/gpt-5-2-codex)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)