# Composer 2.5 vs Grok 4.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Composer 2.5 and Grok 4.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/composer-2-5-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: September 21, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Composer 2.5 and Grok 4.7 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Composer 2.5 has the lower published output-token price.
- Grok 4.7 has the larger published context window at 500K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Composer 2.5 | Grok 4.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Cursor | xAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 500K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.50 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Composer 2.5 public-lane score: 50.2 (Estimated · #57/154)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Composer 2.5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 58.4% | 76.0% | Grok 4.7 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 38.00% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Composer 2.5 public-lane score: 51.4 (Supported · #55/156)
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Composer 2.5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | 79.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench31 | 63.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench32 | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench40 | 27.7% | 46.3% | Grok 4.7 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 79.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 71.0% | Coming soon |
| EEBench | Coming soon | 64.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Composer 2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: 73.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Composer 2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Composer 2.5 | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 56.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Composer 2.5 and Grok 4.7?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Composer 2.5 vs Composer 2](/compare/composer-2-vs-composer-2-5)
- [Grok 4.7 vs Composer 2](/compare/composer-2-vs-grok-4-7)
- [Composer 2.5 vs Composer 2 Fast](/compare/composer-2-5-vs-composer-2-fast)
- [Grok 4.7 vs Composer 2 Fast](/compare/composer-2-fast-vs-grok-4-7)

## Explore More

- [Composer 2.5 profile](/models/composer-2-5)
- [Grok 4.7 profile](/models/grok-4-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)