# DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs Gemini 4 Argon

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Gemini 4 Argon across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-gemini-4-argon
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Gemini 4 Argon share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the lower published output-token price.
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the larger published context window at 128K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | DeepSeek | Google |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | null |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 64.59 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 1 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.55 / $2.19 | $2.00 / $10.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 63.7 (Estimated · #14/119)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 51.3% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 65.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 57.40% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 39.5% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 69.2% | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | Coming soon | 68.0% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (6x verifier timeout) | Coming soon | 57.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: 32.5 (Estimated · #87/144)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 68.4 (Supported · #8/144)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 5.11% | 91.90% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 77.9% | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | Coming soon | 55.1% | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | Coming soon | 45.3% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 77.1 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Graphwalks BFS 128K | Coming soon | 99.7% | Coming soon |
| GraphWalks BFS 256K–1M | Coming soon | 84.2% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Chartography (no tools) | Coming soon | 71.6% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 72.9 (Supported · #11/170)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LABBench2 | Coming soon | 88.8% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | Coming soon | 0.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and Gemini 4 Argon?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs DeepSeek V3.2](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [Gemini 4 Argon vs DeepSeek V3.2](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-gemini-4-argon)
- [DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gpt-6-astra)

## Explore More

- [DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) profile](/models/deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [Gemini 4 Argon profile](/models/gemini-4-argon)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)