# DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs GLM-5 (Reasoning)

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GLM-5 (Reasoning) across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-glm-5-reasoning
- Last updated: October 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GLM-5 (Reasoning) share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) has the lower published output-token price.
- GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GLM-5 (Reasoning) |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | DeepSeek | Z.AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 2 | 1 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.55 / $2.19 | $1.00 / $3.20 |

## Category Breakdown

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: 30.3 (Estimated · #95/150)
- GLM-5 (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 5.11% | 23.36% | GLM-5 (Reasoning) |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5 (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 93.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) and GLM-5 (Reasoning)?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs DeepSeek V3.2](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3.2](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-glm-5-reasoning)
- [DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) vs GLM-5.3](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-glm-5-reasoning)

## Explore More

- [DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) profile](/models/deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [GLM-5 (Reasoning) profile](/models/glm-5-reasoning)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)