# DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-gemini-3-1-pro
- Last updated: October 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | DeepSeek | Google |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 50.2 | 64.7 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 30 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.28 / $0.42 | $2.00 / $12.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 38.4 (Supported · #70/128)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 40.2% | 57.8% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| VITA-Bench | 18.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 29.57% | 56.87% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 69.7% | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | Coming soon | 95.6% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 13.3% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 70.8% | Coming soon |
| MazeBench | Coming soon | 1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #99/150)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 39.2 (Supported · #67/150)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-Rebench | 60.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 71.5% | 78.9% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| LiveCodeBench Pro | Coming soon | 82.9% | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 32.03% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | Coming soon | 22.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 57.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 58.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 77.1% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | Coming soon | 0.4% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 80.1 (#17/54)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 83.9% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 69.4% | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 72.4% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 84.4% | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | Coming soon | 29.0% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | Coming soon | 81.3% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 42.2 (Estimated · #109/184)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 67.6 (Supported · #26/184)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 94.3% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 45.4% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | Coming soon | 20.6% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 71.5% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 95.5% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 91.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 58.2 (#82/148)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 65 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 59.649% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 26.829% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-gemini-3-1-pro)
- [DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-deepseek-v3-2)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-3-1-pro)

## Explore More

- [DeepSeek V3.2 profile](/models/deepseek-v3-2)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro profile](/models/gemini-3-1-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)