# DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM-4.6

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4.6 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4.6 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-4.6 has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.6 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | DeepSeek | Z.AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 57.62 | 53.94 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 3 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.28 / $0.42 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 40.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 18.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 29.57% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 37.2 (Supported · #152/183)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 48.8 (Estimated · #84/183)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-Rebench | 60.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 71.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 3.09% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 51.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 41.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 49.7 (Estimated · #92/181)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 45.3 (Estimated · #115/181)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 58 (#71/120)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 42.1 (#98/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 40.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 27.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 22.100% | 3.819% | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 2.100% | 2.128% | GLM-4.6 |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4.6?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [GLM-4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-glm-4-6)
- [DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-deepseek-v3-2)
- [GLM-4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-glm-4-6)

## Explore More

- [DeepSeek V3.2 profile](/models/deepseek-v3-2)
- [GLM-4.6 profile](/models/glm-4-6)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)