# DeepSeek V3.2 vs Muse Spark

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-muse-spark
- Last updated: October 5, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Spark has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 49.4 | 59.99 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 27 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.28 / $0.42 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 49.8 (Supported · #43/119)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 40.2% | 63.8% | Muse Spark |
| VITA-Bench | 18.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 29.57% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 59% | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | Coming soon | 91.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 74.8% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 43.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 30.6 (Estimated · #90/144)
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 51.1 (Supported · #39/144)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-Rebench | 60.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 71.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 77.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 52.4% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench Pro | Coming soon | 80.0% | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | Coming soon | 19.67% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 74.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 53.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 53.4 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 42.5% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 78.5 (#14/49)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 86.4% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 80.4% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 64.7% | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 71.3% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 84.1% | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | Coming soon | 33.0% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 41.7 (Estimated · #98/171)
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 60.3 (Supported · #40/171)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 89.5% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 50.4% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 42.8% | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | Coming soon | 42.8% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 52.6% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 89.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 87.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 56.7 (#75/125)
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 91.9 (#8/125)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- DeepSeek V3.2 public-lane score: 40 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Muse Spark public-lane score: 55.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Muse Spark | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 22.100% | 39.000% | Muse Spark |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 2.100% | 14.600% | Muse Spark |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v3-2-thinking)
- [Muse Spark vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-thinking-vs-muse-spark)
- [DeepSeek V3.2 vs Muse Spark 1.2](/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-muse-spark-1-2)
- [Muse Spark vs Muse Spark 1.2](/compare/muse-spark-vs-muse-spark-1-2)

## Explore More

- [DeepSeek V3.2 profile](/models/deepseek-v3-2)
- [Muse Spark profile](/models/muse-spark)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)