# DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.2

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GLM-5.2 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-glm-5-2
- Last updated: September 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 16
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- GLM-5.2 leads overall 66.84 to 66.59.
- The clearest category separation is in reasoning, where the averages are 60.3 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 75.1 for GLM-5.2.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is LiveCodeBench (Vals) in Coding, with scores of 87.5% and 69.5%.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.2 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | DeepSeek | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Overall Score | 66.59 | 66.84 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 40 | 25 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.435 / $0.87 | $1.40 / $4.40 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: GLM-5.2
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 55.6 (Supported · #37/154)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 58.1 (Supported · #30/154)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 67.9% | 81% | GLM-5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 83.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 60.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 73.6% | 76.8% | GLM-5.2 |
| Toolathlon | 51.8% | 48.2% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| CyberGym | 83.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | 74.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 25.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 31.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 54.7% | 67.8% | GLM-5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | Coming soon | 4.6% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 20.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: GLM-5.2
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 52.3 (Supported · #49/153)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 60.9 (Supported · #19/153)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench Pass@1-COT | 93.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Codeforces | 3206.0 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 55.4% | 62.1% | GLM-5.2 |
| SWE Multilingual | 76.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 67.9% | 81.0% | GLM-5.2 |
| Vibe Code Bench | 49.93% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | 61.5% | 48.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| DeepSWE | 62.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DSBench-FullStack | 71.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DSBench-Hard | 67.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | 59.0% | 58.4% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 87.5% | 69.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 96.4% | 82.8% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 63.7% | Coming soon |
| cursorBench32 | Coming soon | 55.0% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Coming soon
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 60.3 (#15/20)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 75.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR 1M | 83.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CorpusQA 1M | 62.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CritPt | Coming soon | 20.9% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Coming soon
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 60 (Estimated · #38/184)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 60.3 (Supported · #37/184)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-Pro | 87.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SimpleQA | 57.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Chinese-SimpleQA | 84.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | 90.1% | 91.2% | GLM-5.2 |
| GPQA-D | 90.1% | 91.2% | GLM-5.2 |
| HLE | 42.7% | 54.7% | GLM-5.2 |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 92.4% | 85.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 87.0% | 86.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 40.5% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Coming soon
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 89.6 (#22/124)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Coming soon
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 public-lane score: 80.2 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 80.7 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 95.2% | 92.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| IMOAnswerBench | 89.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Apex | 38.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Apex Shortlist | 90.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 99.2% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | Coming soon | 94.4% | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | Coming soon | 91.0% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GLM-5.2?

The widest category gap is in reasoning, where the averages are 60.3 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 75.1 for GLM-5.2.

### How many benchmarks does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cover on BenchLM?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 currently has 40 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-5.2 cover on BenchLM?

GLM-5.2 currently has 25 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3)
- [DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3-flash)

## Explore More

- [DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 profile](/models/deepseek-v4-pro-0813)
- [GLM-5.2 profile](/models/glm-5-2)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)