# Ember-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ember-1 and Ornith-1.5-9B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ember-1-vs-ornith-1-5-9b
- Last updated: September 28, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ember-1 and Ornith-1.5-9B share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ornith-1.5-9B has the lower published output-token price.
- Ember-1 has the larger published context window at 1.04M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ember-1 | Ornith-1.5-9B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Fireworks | Ornith AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1.04M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 27.66 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 16 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $3.00 / $15.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ember-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ornith-1.5-9B public-lane score: 17.9 (Estimated · #103/117)

| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ornith-1.5-9B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 82.0% | 46.2% | Ember-1 |
| τ²-bench Airline | 66.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 30.5% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 54.2% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 41.2% | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | Coming soon | 59.5% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 56.4% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 66.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ember-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ornith-1.5-9B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ornith-1.5-9B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 82.0% | 46.2% | Ember-1 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 92.2% | 70.6% | Ember-1 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 47.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 54.4% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 32.4% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ember-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ornith-1.5-9B public-lane score: 29.3 (Estimated · #145/168)

| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ornith-1.5-9B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | Coming soon | 86.4% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 86.4% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 20.2% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 20.2% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ember-1 and Ornith-1.5-9B?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ember-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B](/compare/ember-1-vs-ornith-1-5-397b)
- [Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B](/compare/ornith-1-5-397b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b)
- [Ember-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B](/compare/ember-1-vs-ornith-1-5-35b-a3b)
- [Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B](/compare/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b)

## Explore More

- [Ember-1 profile](/models/ember-1)
- [Ornith-1.5-9B profile](/models/ornith-1-5-9b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)