# Ember-1 vs Pokee-Isaac 28B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ember-1 and Pokee-Isaac 28B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ember-1-vs-pokee-isaac-28b
- Last updated: September 28, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ember-1 and Pokee-Isaac 28B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Pokee-Isaac 28B has the lower published output-token price.
- Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger published context window at 10M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ember-1 | Pokee-Isaac 28B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Fireworks | Pokee AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1.04M | 10M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $3.00 / $15.00 | $0.15 / $1.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ember-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Pokee-Isaac 28B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Pokee-Isaac 28B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 82.0% | 65.1% | Ember-1 |
| τ²-bench Airline | 66.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 70.9% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 66.2% | Coming soon |
| MCP-Atlas claim coverage | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 95.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ember-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Pokee-Isaac 28B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Pokee-Isaac 28B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 82.0% | 65.1% | Ember-1 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 92.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ember-1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Pokee-Isaac 28B public-lane score: 39.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Pokee-Isaac 28B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCRv2 | Coming soon | 60.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ember-1 and Pokee-Isaac 28B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/ember-1-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Pokee-Isaac 28B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-pokee-isaac-28b)
- [Ember-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-ember-1)
- [Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-pokee-isaac-28b)

## Explore More

- [Ember-1 profile](/models/ember-1)
- [Pokee-Isaac 28B profile](/models/pokee-isaac-28b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)