# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GLM-4.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: September 29, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 7
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Gemini 2.5 Pro leads overall 50.17 to 49.09.
- The clearest category separation is in instruction following, where the averages are 56.4 for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 81.4 for GLM-4.7.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is SWE-bench (Vals) in Coding, with scores of 54.4% and 69.4%.
- GLM-4.7 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Z.AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 200K |
| Overall Score | 50.17 | 49.09 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 25.4 (Estimated · #91/117)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 27.5 (Estimated · #88/117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | 39.95% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 41% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 52% | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | Coming soon | 15.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: GLM-4.7
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 24.4 (Supported · #108/143)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 39.4 (Supported · #63/143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | 73.8% | GLM-4.7 |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 54.4% | 69.4% | GLM-4.7 |
| LiveCodeBench | Coming soon | 84.9% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | Coming soon | 58.7% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 69.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 71.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 71.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 44.1 (Supported · #80/169)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 40.5 (Supported · #98/169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | 85.7% | GLM-4.7 |
| HLE | 18.8% | 24.8% | GLM-4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Directional only
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 56.4 (#76/124)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 81.4 (#51/124)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 35.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 25.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 14.138% | 2.439% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 4.167% | 0.000% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 95.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GLM-4.7?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Gemini 2.5 Pro and GLM-4.7?

The widest category gap is in instruction following, where the averages are 56.4 for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 81.4 for GLM-4.7.

### How many benchmarks does Gemini 2.5 Pro cover on BenchLM?

Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has 8 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-4.7 cover on BenchLM?

GLM-4.7 currently has 17 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-glm-4-7)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)