# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.2

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.2 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-5-2
- Last updated: October 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 6
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 2.5 Pro only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- GPT-5.2 leads overall 59.86 to 49.14.
- The clearest category separation is in instruction following, where the averages are 57.8 for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 92.6 for GPT-5.2.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Vibe Code Bench in Coding, with scores of 0.40% and 53.50%.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | OpenAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 400K |
| Overall Score | 49.14 | 59.86 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 9 | 31 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | $1.75 / $14.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 25.7 (Estimated · #102/128)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 44.4 (Supported · #58/128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | 46.54% | GPT-5.2 |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 65.8% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 47.3% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 34.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: GPT-5.2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 22.3 (Supported · #115/150)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 36.8 (Supported · #73/150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | 80% | GPT-5.2 |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | 53.50% | GPT-5.2 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 54.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 55.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 73.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 64.3 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 52.9% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-1 | Coming soon | 86.17% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 74.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 75.9 (#22/54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | Coming soon | 86.7% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 79.5% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 83.3% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 85.7% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | Coming soon | 86.0% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle) | Coming soon | 85.8% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 83.0% | Coming soon |
| We-Math | Coming soon | 79.0% | Coming soon |
| DynaMath | Coming soon | 86.8% | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 55.8% | Coming soon |
| CC-OCR | Coming soon | 70.3% | Coming soon |
| AI2D_TEST | Coming soon | 92.2% | Coming soon |
| CountBench | Coming soon | 91.9% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 59.8% | Coming soon |
| VideoMMMU | Coming soon | 85.9% | Coming soon |
| MLVU (M-Avg) | Coming soon | 85.6% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 82.1% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 75.9% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: GPT-5.2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 45.6 (Supported · #96/184)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 59.7 (Supported · #50/184)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | 92.4% | GPT-5.2 |
| HLE | 18.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Directional only
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 57.8 (#83/148)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 92.6 (#19/148)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 36.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 71.1 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2024 | 92% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 24.561% | 67.400% | GPT-5.2 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | 31.700% | GPT-5.2 |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 100% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.2?

The widest category gap is in instruction following, where the averages are 57.8 for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 92.6 for GPT-5.2.

### How many benchmarks does Gemini 2.5 Pro cover on BenchLM?

Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has 9 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does GPT-5.2 cover on BenchLM?

GPT-5.2 currently has 31 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.2 Pro](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
- [GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.2 Pro](/compare/gpt-5-2-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.2 Instant](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-5-2-instant)
- [GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.2 Instant](/compare/gpt-5-2-vs-gpt-5-2-instant)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [GPT-5.2 profile](/models/gpt-5-2)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)