# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs K-EXAONE 2.0

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and K-EXAONE 2.0 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-k-exaone-2-0
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 2.5 Pro and K-EXAONE 2.0 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- K-EXAONE 2.0 has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | LG AI Research |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 57.12 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 15 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 47.7 (Estimated · #68/152)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 43.8% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 77.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 31.7 (Supported · #134/151)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | 68.2% | K-EXAONE 2.0 |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 37.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 43.8% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 70.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 68.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 50.6 (Supported · #76/183)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 18.8% | 18.3% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 83.5% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |
| MMMLU | Coming soon | 86.6% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 57.9 (#74/123)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 72.6% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| PolyMath | Coming soon | 71.3% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 35.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 14.138% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 4.167% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 92.3% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | Coming soon | 78.6% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 2.5 Pro and K-EXAONE 2.0?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-k-exaone-2-0)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-k-exaone-2-0)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 profile](/models/k-exaone-2-0)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)