# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Xiaomi |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 57.98 | 65.41 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 13 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 49.3 (Estimated · #70/151)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 40.8 (Supported · #118/151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | 62.70% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 63.8% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 72.9% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 68.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 57.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 32 (Supported · #165/183)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 57.1 (Estimated · #36/183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 57.2% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 68.4% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 81.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 74.0% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 70.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 68.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 76.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 51.1 (Supported · #84/181)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 55.5 (Supported · #58/181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 18.8% | 48% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 34% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 84.6% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 57.7 (#72/120)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 93.5 (#6/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 35.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 14.138% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 4.167% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-mimo-v2-5)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.5](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro profile](/models/mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)
